|
If a great change is to
override human tyrrany of animals,
a great collection of
human minds will by word and deed
authorize such change.
And the inevidable opposition will
appear to be opposed to
the decrees of Justice itself,
rather than the fervent
desires of a compassionate
multitude. Factual
cause, however shocking, can
incite 'desires' for a
legal and moral change of
the moral status of
animals broadly defined.
This site is a huge
amalgam of 'factual
cause' not publicized by
your
newspaper.
J. B. Suconik
Rowland Hill* said: I would give nothing for that man's
religion,
whose very dog, and cat are not the better for it.*
J. B. Suconik says I would give nothing for that man's religion
whereby the Animal Kingdom is not the better for it.
* English preacher 1744 - 1843.
*
,..."
every sentient creature has a property in itself which should,
it we are to abide by our own principle of justice,
prohibit
human ownership and brutal exploitation of animals as
it
prohibits ownership and exploitation of humans."
Page13 Animals: Why They Must Not Be Brutalized Nuark
Publishing
* * Vivitorment
A name befitting the practice as opposed to vivisection
|
